Sample verdicts
See the rules decide
Four requests an AI might get that the EU AI Act prohibits or restricts, and one that it allows. Each block names the rule that decided and the article it cites; the allowed request is recorded too, with no citation.
These are pre-run samples, not live requests: each prompt was run through the ComplyEdge rule set ahead of time, and nothing is sent when you click. On the hosted API, the phrase rules run first. On a paid plan, after a clean pass, an injection meaning check can also block when the month's model budget covers it, and a missing answer denies. If that budget is used up, the phrase rules decide. If you turn on the wider legal review and the month's model budget covers it, a model can lift a rule's block or refuse a request the rules passed, and the record names which. If that budget is used up, it does not run.
Result
Try your own request
The samples above need no setup. To send your own prompt to the engine and get a decision back, use the playground or the API with a free key: the response carries the rule ID and citation of any rule that matches.
Why you can trust these verdicts
The samples above are phrase-rule decisions. The rule ID and the citation on those blocks are copied from the published rule. On the hosted API the phrase rules run first. On a paid plan the injection meaning check can still block a clean pass when the month's model budget covers it, and a missing answer denies. If that budget is used up, the phrase rules decide. With the wider legal review turned on and the month's model budget covering it, a model can also lift a block or refuse a request, and the record says so. If that budget is used up, it does not run. Read the rules, or reproduce any verdict with your own key.